You can read the complete article here and select others from our collection of 70+ articles on our site.

Imagine going to the doctor only to have your pain waved away as “just old age.” For millions of elderly Americans, that scenario isn’t rare—it’s routine. As the population of adults over 60 rapidly expands, our healthcare system remains dangerously behind, shaped by outdated assumptions and a deep-rooted bias against aging. If we are to deliver equitable, effective care in the 21st century, eldercare reform is not optional. It is a moral and medical imperative.

Ageism in medicine is not subtle. Older patients are routinely excluded from clinical trials, meaning that many treatments are calibrated to younger bodies with different metabolisms and fewer health complications. Medications proven “safe and effective” in a 40-year-old can pose significant risks to someone managing multiple chronic conditions at 80. Despite this, doctors too often rely on one-size-fits-all protocols, even when those standards fail to serve—or worse, actively harm—the elderly.

Part of the problem lies in how we conceptualize aging. For much of modern medical history, aging has been treated not as a life stage requiring specialized attention, but as a slow, inevitable decline—unworthy of proactive treatment or innovation. This perception has contributed to chronic underfunding in geriatric research and to a medical education system that still offers little in the way of comprehensive training in eldercare. As a result, many physicians enter practice ill-equipped to recognize atypical disease presentations in older patients or to tailor care plans to their complex needs.

This failure has real consequences. Chronic pain in the elderly is often misdiagnosed or ignored. Cognitive changes are dismissed as “just getting older” rather than explored as treatable symptoms. The widespread phenomenon of polypharmacy—prescribing multiple medications without cohesive oversight—can lead to dangerous drug interactions, deteriorating health, and a loss of autonomy. These aren't just system errors; they're signals of a deeper societal indifference.

That indifference is cultural as much as institutional. Our society’s obsession with youth colors how we see aging—frail, forgetful, irrelevant. These stereotypes don’t just offend; they actively shape clinical decisions. Older adults are less likely to be offered aggressive treatment for conditions like cancer or cardiovascular disease. Mental health concerns like depression are too often brushed off, leading to needless suffering and isolation. If these patterns affected another demographic—say, children or veterans—there would be national outrage. But because the victims are older, we call it "natural."

Worse, the burdens of medical ageism fall unevenly. Elderly women, people of color, and low-income individuals often face compounded discrimination. An older Black woman, for instance, may confront skepticism about her pain, inadequate access to care, and the weight of intersecting racial, gendered, and ageist assumptions. The intersectionality of eldercare inequality demands a similarly nuanced response—one that prioritizes inclusion, cultural competence, and community-based solutions.

To some, these disparities are the result of necessary triage. Resources are finite, they argue; care must be rationed. But this framing hinges on a dangerous presumption—that older lives are somehow worth less. In truth, equity is not about uniformity; it’s about justice. An 82-year-old with arthritis, diabetes, and resilience built over a lifetime deserves care tailored to her experience, not rationed because of it.

To move forward, we need both systemic reform and cultural change. Medical schools must embed geriatric care in their core curricula, not as an elective or afterthought. Funding must flow toward age-related research, and clinical trials must be required to include older adults in meaningful numbers. Age-specific treatment guidelines should be standard, not exceptional.

At the same time, we must amplify elder voices in healthcare leadership and decision-making. Older patients—and professionals—bring insight that is too often ignored. Senior healthcare workers, for instance, face discrimination within their own field, perceived as out-of-touch despite their lived expertise. Their marginalization reflects a larger paradox: we trust youth to care for the aging, but rarely empower the aged to shape that care.

We also need to shift public perception. Campaigns to combat ageism, particularly in media and advertising, can help reframe aging as a stage of growth rather than decline. Just as movements have redefined how we view gender and disability, a cultural reckoning with age could transform not only policy, but empathy.

Our elderly population is not a burden; it is a national asset. These are the people who raised families, built communities, fought wars, and paid into the systems that now fail them. They deserve better—not just as patients, but as citizens. A healthcare system that honors their complexity, listens to their concerns, and respects their worth will be better for all of us.

If we care about human dignity, we must prove it where it counts most—in the exam room, the policy chamber, and the research lab. The time to build a healthcare system that serves our elderly with the attention and compassion they deserve is not tomorrow. It’s now.

The video discusses the 5 M’s of age-friendly healthcare, focusing on medications, mentation, mobility, multi-morbidity, and what matters most. Dr. Petrakos and Dr. Liggett emphasize the importance of patient-centered care, aligning treatment with patient goals, and minimizing inappropriate medications for older adults. Screening for cognitive issues and prioritizing patient preferences are key aspects of providing quality care in various healthcare settings. Research methods involving thematic analysis were used to understand patient values in skilled nursing facilities. The 5 M’s framework aims to enhance the quality of care for older adults by addressing their specific needs and preferences.

The discussion emphasizes the importance of aligning healthcare with patient values and preferences to enhance the quality of care for older adults. By focusing on what matters most to patients, healthcare providers can improve patient outcomes and overall quality of life. Practicing patient-centered care and prioritizing patient goals are essential in delivering personalized and effective healthcare services, especially in nursing facilities. Understanding and incorporating patient values into treatment plans can lead to better patient-provider relationships and more successful medical interventions.

View the video here

0:51 – Dr. Alexandra Petrakos explains the concept of “What Matters Most” in age-friendly healthcare, focusing on the 5 M’s: medications, mentation, mobility, multi-morbidity, and what matters most.

2:16 – Dr. Anna Liggett discusses the importance of realigning patient goals in skilled nursing facilities to focus on medications, mobility, and what matters most to the patients.

3:21 – Dr. Petrakos emphasizes the significance of reviewing medication lists and minimizing inappropriate medications for older patients to improve quality care.

4:14 – Dr. Petrakos highlights the importance of screening for dementia, delirium, and depression in older patients to provide comprehensive care.

4:31 – Dr. Petrakos explains the role of physical and occupational therapy in improving mobility and independence for older adults in post-acute care settings.

5:19 – Dr. Liggett describes the research methods used to understand what matters most to patients in skilled nursing facilities, involving thematic analysis of patient responses.

06:59 – Personal health goals and safety were key themes identified in patient surveys.

07:12 – Patients valued staff competence, professionalism, and kindness in skilled nursing facilities.

07:32 – Cleanliness, quality, and food were significant factors affecting what matters most to patients.

08:09 – Patients’ emphasis on cleanliness and food quality surprised and delighted Dr. Petrakos.

09:26 – Focusing on patient goals and preferences is crucial in providing quality care in nursing facilities.

10:18 – Patients in rehab need a supportive environment for healing and restoration.

11:28 – Practicing patient-centered care based on what matters most to patients is crucial for quality of life.

12:07 – Taking the time to understand what matters most to patients can deepen the provider-patient relationship.

12:42 – Understanding patients’ priorities can guide providers in delivering more effective treatment.

Video: Aging in the Health Care System | WebMD

---

Additional Resources Cielito Lindo Offers
We have curated collections of resources that may be useful.

Articles - We write fresh articles about senior living, health, care, and finances every week
Caregiver Books - We review books related to caregiving methods, logistics, challenges, and coping
Senior Health - We review books related to healthspan, lifespan, and disease

We also have 1,600+ other senior care and expat in Mexico videos:  YouTube

Here is our YouTube Channel. This is where we have lots of videos about Cielito Lindo and Rancho Los Labradores.  We also have 1,600+ other senior care and expat in Mexico videos:  YouTube